Eredan

So I have taken a break from Eredan for some time and upon my return I found myself wondering: What is the new Meta?

Now, with any progressive game the meta is constantly changing so why not keep track of the meta? When I left the meta involved certain cards I see have been nerfed and banned from ...

http://prntscr.com/1vlbwj

Here I searched for guildless spells, but sap spells show up too.

Ayept's ability that says "For each dead: +1 atk, def and +1 to 2 health". Does that mean that if someone is dead then that happens or that happens for each dead? Coz for me it only happens once even when 3 or 4 characters are dead so it might be a text error or a bug.

Also "At the end of the turn ...

So are mages now obsolete? What with being a new toolbox card.

Kotoba Shadow failed to remove the defense bonuses on the new Pirate Champion.

I have an idea.
We have our ELO system yes? And it works relatively well.
Why not try a more simple system on a trial run?
Something like a round robbin where you face off against each opponent once and the one with the most wins gets 1st prize then you have deciders if there is a tie.

Other way is ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Values of the Nomads

http://static.eredan.com/cards/web_big/us/ZDI0qoXy.png

Hidden Effect(s): All cards from his the discard pile are returned to the deck, if the opposing character has a card ...

Well, you can't target the same char that used it, but its still a +3 attack boost for the rest of the game to an ally, as long as you play it early. Privus' suicidal tendancies make it sort of awkward, but it hasn't been too difficult to reap the benefits of it so far.
Are you sure about that ...

Mang Isko wrote:-1 One hit, one dead
+1 ecstasy
+1 Incursion (since Utkin is the only one who can't do the LotR+Nehant's Splinter)

Is this deck competative?

Just general translation errors or incorrect English or even misspellings.
Example: The new trophy card says "...each character who has took part...", but it should say "...each character that has taken part..." or "...each character that took part..."