Auteur |
Message |
Scorvos
|
Publié : 05 Février 2013, 16:17 |
|
Guémélite |
|
Inscription : 04 Février 2013, 16:17 Message(s) : 127 Localisation : United States
|
Desert Nomad Priest Deck - focuses on Magic Damage Anger Theurgies.
x 3 x 3 x 1 x 3 x 3 x 3 (only good every other turn)
AND four more Cards
Right now I am filling those spots in with , , and ; but I could really use some help from the Community.
|
|
Haut |
|
|
Wolvos
|
Publié : 05 Février 2013, 17:25 |
|
Immortel |
|
Inscription : 04 Février 2013, 17:01 Message(s) : 6173 Localisation : da world
|
i watched that deck in action, 3 for high sipirit characters
_________________ My (outdated) deckscreate a new post if you want to communicate with me, DONT SEND PMs!!!! CURRENT STATUS: OFFLINE / NOT MODERATING
|
|
Haut |
|
|
Teremune
|
Publié : 05 Février 2013, 22:45 |
|
Aventurier |
|
Inscription : 04 Février 2013, 19:30 Message(s) : 50
|
Wolvos a écrit : i watched that deck in action, 3 for high sipirit characters Yes 3 would let you beat hurt mages a lot easier, and of course what Wolvos mentioned for higher spirit characters also.
_________________ Blarg!!
|
|
Haut |
|
|
Scorvos
|
Publié : 05 Février 2013, 23:01 |
|
Guémélite |
|
Inscription : 04 Février 2013, 16:17 Message(s) : 127 Localisation : United States
|
Teremune a écrit : Wolvos a écrit : i watched that deck in action, 3 for high sipirit characters Yes 3 would let you beat hurt mages a lot easier, and of course what Wolvos mentioned for higher spirit characters also. Shame it is not a Thurgey - but I will add some and give it a shot this evening.
|
|
Haut |
|
|
Gambaro
|
Publié : 28 Février 2013, 02:27 |
|
Inscription : 15 Février 2013, 01:11 Message(s) : 27
|
How much does this deck cost? Cause I killed it with a 220k-immortal-deck.
|
|
Haut |
|
|
6X-X9
|
Publié : 28 Février 2013, 13:08 |
|
Marchand |
|
Inscription : 04 Février 2013, 21:51 Message(s) : 581 Localisation : Juste derrière toi
|
I'd say 120k at most. Beating it with your deck once does not mean it's worse than yours anyway. Lady Luck could have been by your side. I think it must rely a bit too much on cures (like most priest decks ) but it must be a pretty fun deck.
_________________ [EXY] ExylèmeCollectionneuse de cartes. ~Passée mythique le 02/07/2013~Types de jeux: AoE et jeux fun et rapides.
|
|
Haut |
|
|
iPoop
|
Publié : 28 Février 2013, 15:13 |
|
Aventurier |
|
Inscription : 05 Février 2013, 06:06 Message(s) : 78
|
Killing a deck using a favor of the month deck doesn't mean much And somehow i agree that this deck would get crushed pretty hard , simply because it doesn't have any good way to survive beside
Dernière édition par iPoop le 28 Février 2013, 15:19, édité 1 fois.
|
|
Haut |
|
|
Wolvos
|
Publié : 28 Février 2013, 15:17 |
|
Immortel |
|
Inscription : 04 Février 2013, 17:01 Message(s) : 6173 Localisation : da world
|
iPoop a écrit : Killing a deck using a favor of the month deck doesn't mean much
_________________ My (outdated) deckscreate a new post if you want to communicate with me, DONT SEND PMs!!!! CURRENT STATUS: OFFLINE / NOT MODERATING
|
|
Haut |
|
|
Scorvos
|
Publié : 28 Février 2013, 18:54 |
|
Guémélite |
|
Inscription : 04 Février 2013, 16:17 Message(s) : 127 Localisation : United States
|
Oh in no way is this a high level competitive deck;
more this was a concept deck...
"I think is cool, how can it be used"
And now that Ra is perma-ban for all formats, it is a little more lack luster.
|
|
Haut |
|
|
Hearfomi
|
Publié : 28 Février 2013, 20:00 |
|
Inscription : 05 Février 2013, 18:52 Message(s) : 26
|
Such a shame that offensive priests (magic/direct damage) aren't viable They need some love *new character to replace Avatar *some defensive theurgies (double clay as a theurgy ^^) *some more theurgy chains
|
|
Haut |
|
|