I'd say 120k at most. Beating it with your deck once does not mean it's worse than yours anyway.
Lady Luck could have been by your side. I think it must rely a bit too much on cures (like most priest decks
) but it must be a pretty fun deck.
| Eredan http://forums.eredan.com/ |
|
| The Wrath of Ra http://forums.eredan.com/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=278 |
Page 1 sur 2 |
| Auteur : | Scorvos [ 05 Février 2013, 16:17 ] |
| Sujet du message : | The Wrath of Ra |
Desert Nomad Priest Deck - focuses on Magic Damage Anger Theurgies. x 3 x 3 x 1 x 3 x 3 x 3 (only good every other turn) AND four more Cards Right now I am filling those spots in with , , and ; but I could really use some help from the Community. |
|
| Auteur : | Wolvos [ 05 Février 2013, 17:25 ] |
| Sujet du message : | Re: The Wrath of Ra |
i watched that deck in action, 3 for high sipirit characters |
|
| Auteur : | Teremune [ 05 Février 2013, 22:45 ] |
| Sujet du message : | Re: The Wrath of Ra |
Wolvos a écrit : i watched that deck in action, 3 for high sipirit characters Yes 3 would let you beat hurt mages a lot easier, and of course what Wolvos mentioned for higher spirit characters also. |
|
| Auteur : | Scorvos [ 05 Février 2013, 23:01 ] |
| Sujet du message : | Re: The Wrath of Ra |
Teremune a écrit : Wolvos a écrit : i watched that deck in action, 3 for high sipirit characters Yes 3 would let you beat hurt mages a lot easier, and of course what Wolvos mentioned for higher spirit characters also. Shame it is not a Thurgey - but I will add some and give it a shot this evening. |
|
| Auteur : | Gambaro [ 28 Février 2013, 02:27 ] |
| Sujet du message : | Re: The Wrath of Ra |
How much does this deck cost? Cause I killed it with a 220k-immortal-deck. |
|
| Auteur : | 6X-X9 [ 28 Février 2013, 13:08 ] |
| Sujet du message : | Re: The Wrath of Ra |
I'd say 120k at most. Beating it with your deck once does not mean it's worse than yours anyway. Lady Luck could have been by your side. I think it must rely a bit too much on cures (like most priest decks ) but it must be a pretty fun deck.
|
|
| Auteur : | iPoop [ 28 Février 2013, 15:13 ] |
| Sujet du message : | Re: The Wrath of Ra |
Killing a deck using a favor of the month deck doesn't mean much  And somehow i agree that this deck would get crushed pretty hard , simply because it doesn't have any good way to survive beside |
|
| Auteur : | Wolvos [ 28 Février 2013, 15:17 ] |
| Sujet du message : | Re: The Wrath of Ra |
iPoop a écrit : Killing a deck using a favor of the month deck doesn't mean much 
|
|
| Auteur : | Scorvos [ 28 Février 2013, 18:54 ] |
| Sujet du message : | Re: The Wrath of Ra |
Oh in no way is this a high level competitive deck; more this was a concept deck... "I think is cool, how can it be used" And now that Ra is perma-ban for all formats, it is a little more lack luster. |
|
| Auteur : | Hearfomi [ 28 Février 2013, 20:00 ] |
| Sujet du message : | Re: The Wrath of Ra |
Such a shame that offensive priests (magic/direct damage) aren't viable  They need some love*new character to replace Avatar *some defensive theurgies (double clay as a theurgy ^^) *some more theurgy chains |
|
| Page 1 sur 2 | Le fuseau horaire est UTC+1 heure [Heure d’été] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|