so if nothing changed... why changing the system then? i m not a friend of pure legend decks myself but to me it makes no difference if i lose to one legend or four of them... i m pretty curious if there really will be a change after a while... as of now i m looking at this rather pessimistically

The I heard change did not happen, yet. Yesterday someone told in Chat that his opponent had 3 legendarys played, so looks like this changing will start with the next Quilingo. (If you are in the deck builder the show the new restrictions, but the tournament seems to accept the old quilingo-version).

So there may be a change with next Quilingo.

until now player could abuse many legends, but the ristriction to one legend makes a whole difference (less drawing chance, less win-options, etc.) and anyone, who has one must-have-legend has the same chance, than someone who had 3 or more legends in his former deck.

The rare-restriction is also painfull and yes, someone rich or with many old cards has more options for similar cards to have less changes on the deck. I think this restriction may do things easier for the rich/OP-player and harder for the common player.

_________________
/\_/\
>^,^<
-/ \
(__)__,
Al hail and glory to the Zil, the living Shadow and the Circus!

PS.: Right now I'm only on for calendar. Not playing activ.
We lost the balance too bad since the damned sacred cards.

its so funny... which old cards? we are talking about the last 3 acts...

the chances to draw the card you need has never changed...

the issue i was tackling is that exactly the "win-chance" you are talking about apparently is not affected as of now... (and i added that i m curious but also pessimistic about the development)

and no the restrictions are in place already... what IS possible is to abuse a glitch with lady yllith as she is not considered legend anymore with her ice frame... but that has been reported and should soon (if not already) be fixed...