Consulter les messages sans réponse | Consulter les sujets actifs
| Auteur |
Message |
|
mangg
|
 Publié : 09 Août 2013, 12:32 |
|
Inscription : 09 Avril 2013, 10:43
Message(s) : 45
|
Cuz she deserves to be healed by in standard  Seriously.. It only makes sense! . Look how adorable she looks among these 2!
|
|
| Haut |
|
 |
|
Pikadusk
|
Publié : 09 Août 2013, 18:39 |
|
Inscription : 05 Février 2013, 01:21
Message(s) : 536
|
|
Eh? I suppose spiritspeaker being cute is a matter of opinion. Though Spiritspeaker is more of a sap heart version of Pilkim the mage of Noz who isn't a compendium, so you would be taking away its only claim to fame. Besides standard line up for world tree mage is , , and with standard having no specific mage Dias only card that would make spiritspeaker desirable over Koria.
_________________
Ty Boadicea for the awesome farewell gift. Now just to think up an avatar to go with it. Anyway, I'm still a Sap/Nomad/Pirates fan and user.
|
|
| Haut |
|
|
|
mangg
|
Publié : 13 Août 2013, 06:42 |
|
Inscription : 09 Avril 2013, 10:43
Message(s) : 45
|
Joseph_Strom a écrit : Eh? I suppose spiritspeaker being cute is a matter of opinion. Though Spiritspeaker is more of a sap heart version of Pilkim the mage of Noz who isn't a compendium, so you would be taking away its only claim to fame. Besides standard line up for world tree mage is , , and with standard having no specific mage Dias only card that would make spiritspeaker desirable over Koria. huh? Branches dude, branches.. Do your research right ^_^
|
|
| Haut |
|
|
|
Pikadusk
|
Publié : 13 Août 2013, 10:34 |
|
Inscription : 05 Février 2013, 01:21
Message(s) : 536
|
mangg a écrit : Joseph_Strom a écrit : Eh? I suppose spiritspeaker being cute is a matter of opinion. Though Spiritspeaker is more of a sap heart version of Pilkim the mage of Noz who isn't a compendium, so you would be taking away its only claim to fame. Besides standard line up for world tree mage is , , and with standard having no specific mage Dias only card that would make spiritspeaker desirable over Koria. huh? Branches dude, branches.. Do your research right ^_^ I was referring to the guild spells, but either way, you don't even need a world-tree deck to play branches, dude. And even then if you wanted to play it in a world-tree deck, you could play it in the warrior world-tree deck which has Quericus, Keizan (warrior version), and Cervus, all three of which can play nature spells because of their nature guem/Dias typing and because of Quericus skill of upgrading a stat can use it to do additional damage to what they are attacking. PS. I've been playing Sap Hearts, since I first played Eredan, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about.
_________________
Ty Boadicea for the awesome farewell gift. Now just to think up an avatar to go with it. Anyway, I'm still a Sap/Nomad/Pirates fan and user.
|
|
| Haut |
|
|
|
mangg
|
Publié : 13 Août 2013, 11:24 |
|
Inscription : 09 Avril 2013, 10:43
Message(s) : 45
|
Joseph_Strom a écrit : mangg a écrit : Joseph_Strom a écrit : Eh? I suppose spiritspeaker being cute is a matter of opinion. Though Spiritspeaker is more of a sap heart version of Pilkim the mage of Noz who isn't a compendium, so you would be taking away its only claim to fame. Besides standard line up for world tree mage is , , and with standard having no specific mage Dias only card that would make spiritspeaker desirable over Koria. huh? Branches dude, branches.. Do your research right ^_^ I was referring to the guild spells, but either way, you don't even need a world-tree deck to play branches, dude. And even then if you wanted to play it in a world-tree deck, you could play it in the warrior world-tree deck which has Quericus, Keizan (warrior version), and Cervus, all three of which can play nature spells because of their nature guem/Dias typing and because of Quericus skill of upgrading a stat can use it to do additional damage to what they are attacking. PS. I've been playing Sap Hearts, since I first played Eredan, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about. I did not tell you anything. And it is Dais not Dias. If I wanted to play a warrior world-tree deck, I would. But I don't. Koria is an OK card, however my concern was purely aesthetic. You don't need to come here and start giving unnecessary lectures to people about how long you have been playing saps for. All I can say is, good for you. Congrats for playing sap for so long, nobody is entitled to tell you that you could ever be wrong, just because the fact that you've played saps for so long. On your argument; Both and make spiritbreaker more desirable over Koria. And both are essential cards in a mage Sap deck. So before starting another boring lecture on warrior world-tree decks, keep in mind that this topic is about how cute/ugly he/she looks among these other 2.  )) I'd respect your opinion on her being ugly and not deserving to be a world-tree, if you had one, but apart from that whatever you have to say is irrelevant. Especially if it is about building decks and all...
|
|
| Haut |
|
|
|
Pikadusk
|
Publié : 13 Août 2013, 17:56 |
|
Inscription : 05 Février 2013, 01:21
Message(s) : 536
|
mangg a écrit : Joseph_Strom a écrit : I was referring to the guild spells, but either way, you don't even need a world-tree deck to play branches, dude. And even then if you wanted to play it in a world-tree deck, you could play it in the warrior world-tree deck which has Quericus, Keizan (warrior version), and Cervus, all three of which can play nature spells because of their nature guem/Dias typing and because of Quericus skill of upgrading a stat can use it to do additional damage to what they are attacking.
PS. I've been playing Sap Hearts, since I first played Eredan, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about. I did not tell you anything. And it is Dais not Dias. If I wanted to play a warrior world-tree deck, I would. But I don't. Koria is an OK card, however my concern was purely aesthetic. You don't need to come here and start giving unnecessary lectures to people about how long you have been playing saps for. All I can say is, good for you. Congrats for playing sap for so long, nobody is entitled to tell you that you could ever be wrong, just because the fact that you've played saps for so long. On your argument; Both and make spiritbreaker more desirable over Koria. And both are essential cards in a mage Sap deck. So before starting another boring lecture on warrior world-tree decks, keep in mind that this topic is about how cute/ugly he/she looks among these other 2. )) I'd respect your opinion on her being ugly and not deserving to be a world-tree, if you had one, but apart from that whatever you have to say is irrelevant. Especially if it is about building decks and all... If you don't want Spiritspeaker to change to a world-tree for deck building purpose there isn't really a point of changing her just for aesthitics purposes, since you can pretty much put whoever you want together as long as they share the same guild or are mercenaries. I have other Dais I like more then it and I have a thing against changing old cards, especially ones that been in my collection from day one, and trees don't have genders, so its proper to call them by the gender neutral pronoun it. Another thing, I only listed World-Tree warriors, because you seemed only interested in having three Dais together, whether they had syngergies or not, truth be told last I checked the best deck for world-tree was a combo of warriors and mages. Now for the deck building part of world-tree mages, which you probably don't want to read. There is one thing that makes Spiritspeaker undesirable with Ebony and Keizan that being its turn order bonus. With its turn order bonus Spiritspeaker being 2 and 4 the same as Ebony, first turn order bonus, and two of Keizan's turn orders all it brings to the table is being a Dais, While Koria brings the ability heal and on turn 1 and 7 stop your opponent from playing items when you go first. If anything you should be wanting Fe'y back into standard, so that its turn bonus which has synergies with both Keizan and Ebony because of its turn bonus being 1, 3, and 6. If Spiritspeaker was to be useful it would need either another evolution to gain another turn order or a remake, but aesthetically you don't need to give a card a new caste just for them to be in the same deck.
_________________
Ty Boadicea for the awesome farewell gift. Now just to think up an avatar to go with it. Anyway, I'm still a Sap/Nomad/Pirates fan and user.
|
|
| Haut |
|
|
|
mangg
|
Publié : 13 Août 2013, 18:29 |
|
Inscription : 09 Avril 2013, 10:43
Message(s) : 45
|
Joseph_Strom a écrit : mangg a écrit : Joseph_Strom a écrit : I was referring to the guild spells, but either way, you don't even need a world-tree deck to play branches, dude. And even then if you wanted to play it in a world-tree deck, you could play it in the warrior world-tree deck which has Quericus, Keizan (warrior version), and Cervus, all three of which can play nature spells because of their nature guem/Dias typing and because of Quericus skill of upgrading a stat can use it to do additional damage to what they are attacking.
PS. I've been playing Sap Hearts, since I first played Eredan, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about. I did not tell you anything. And it is Dais not Dias. If I wanted to play a warrior world-tree deck, I would. But I don't. Koria is an OK card, however my concern was purely aesthetic. You don't need to come here and start giving unnecessary lectures to people about how long you have been playing saps for. All I can say is, good for you. Congrats for playing sap for so long, nobody is entitled to tell you that you could ever be wrong, just because the fact that you've played saps for so long. On your argument; Both and make spiritbreaker more desirable over Koria. And both are essential cards in a mage Sap deck. So before starting another boring lecture on warrior world-tree decks, keep in mind that this topic is about how cute/ugly he/she looks among these other 2. )) I'd respect your opinion on her being ugly and not deserving to be a world-tree, if you had one, but apart from that whatever you have to say is irrelevant. Especially if it is about building decks and all... If you don't want Spiritspeaker to change to a world-tree for deck building purpose there isn't really a point of changing her just for aesthitics purposes, since you can pretty much put whoever you want together as long as they share the same guild or are mercenaries. I have other Dais I like more then it and I have a thing against changing old cards, especially ones that been in my collection from day one, and trees don't have genders, so its proper to call them by the gender neutral pronoun it. Another thing, I only listed World-Tree warriors, because you seemed only interested in having three Dais together, whether they had syngergies or not, truth be told last I checked the best deck for world-tree was a combo of warriors and mages. Now for the deck building part of world-tree mages, which you probably don't want to read. There is one thing that makes Spiritspeaker undesirable with Ebony and Keizan that being its turn order bonus. With its turn order bonus Spiritspeaker being 2 and 4 the same as Ebony, first turn order bonus, and two of Keizan's turn orders all it brings to the table is being a Dais, While Koria brings the ability heal and on turn 1 and 7 stop your opponent from playing items when you go first. If anything you should be wanting Fe'y back into standard, so that its turn bonus which has synergies with both Keizan and Ebony because of its turn bonus being 1, 3, and 6. If Spiritspeaker was to be useful it would need either another evolution to gain another turn order or a remake, but aesthetically you don't need to give a card a new caste just for them to be in the same deck. Having Fe'y in standard would have been great indeed. Apart from that, as far as I know every single dais (minus death-tree) is also a world-tree. It just doesn't make any sense.
|
|
| Haut |
|
|
|
Pikadusk
|
Publié : 13 Août 2013, 18:45 |
|
Inscription : 05 Février 2013, 01:21
Message(s) : 536
|
mangg a écrit : Having Fe'y in standard would have been great indeed. Apart from that, as far as I know every single dais (minus death-tree) is also a world-tree. It just doesn't make any sense. Like I said originally it is the Sap version of , it was one of the first sap heart cards made before all the other Dais decided to be World Tree or in Pilkim's case before all the other Noz mages decided to be Compendium.
_________________
Ty Boadicea for the awesome farewell gift. Now just to think up an avatar to go with it. Anyway, I'm still a Sap/Nomad/Pirates fan and user.
|
|
| Haut |
|
|
Qui est en ligne ? |
Utilisateur(s) parcourant ce forum : Aucun utilisateur inscrit et 0 invité(s) |
|
Vous ne pouvez pas publier de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas insérer de pièces jointes dans ce forum
|
|
